The Canon EOS R5 was highly anticipated and widely marketed as a groundbreaking camera capable of capturing 8K video with internal RAW recording and 4K video at 120 frames per second. These capabilities positioned the camera as a desirable tool for serious videographers, especially in niche environments like underwater filmmaking. However, the reality proved to be more complex. Shortly after its release, many users began to experience overheating issues, particularly when using the camera’s highest recording settings. Canon eventually acknowledged the issue and published estimated limits on recording times based on resolution and framerate.
At a room temperature of 23°C, Canon claimed that the EOS R5 could record up to 20 minutes of 8K video at 30p with internal RAW enabled and about 15 minutes of 4K video at 120p before overheating. After this limit was reached, the camera would require a cooldown period of 10–20 minutes before it could resume recording even a single minute of video. For underwater videographers, these constraints could render some dive sessions unproductive if the camera was pushed too far early on. We recommend that users aiming to record at 8K or 4K 120p plan to capture no more than 20–25 minutes of footage during a single dive. Once overheating occurs, while the camera may still be capable of capturing photos, recording video again will only be possible after the device has cooled sufficiently. This typically requires powering the unit off entirely to allow adequate heat dissipation.
Canon later released firmware updates (from version 1.0.0 to 1.1.0) aimed at extending recording durations. Our team tested these claims and found them to hold, with an improvement of approximately five minutes. Nevertheless, the limitations remained concerning enough to warrant a formal underwater overheating test. The aim was to evaluate real-world scenarios and help underwater videographers better understand how the EOS R5 performs in different aquatic environments.
The Importance of Real-World Testing
Although Canon provided temperature-based benchmarks for overheating, underwater environments introduce additional variables. Pressure, water temperature, housing materials, and ambient light all interact with the internal heat generation of a camera in complex ways. For videographers capturing rare marine life or documenting coral reef ecosystems, every minute of recording counts. Missing a critical moment due to overheating could mean the loss of irreplaceable footage. Therefore, we designed a series of tests to evaluate how long the Canon EOS R5 could record underwater at high settings before overheating, and how long it would take to recover after the shutdown.
To replicate realistic shooting conditions, we used an Ikelite underwater housing and conducted three separate tests. The first test was in warm water (88°F) with firmware version 1.0.0. The second was in the same warm water, but with updated firmware 1.1.1. The third test took place in cold water (57°F), also using firmware 1.1.1. In each test, we recorded 8K video at 30p with internal RAW recording enabled. After the overheating shutoff occurred, we left the camera submerged until it was able to record one additional minute of video. The goal was to evaluate both the initial recording duration and the recovery time under these different conditions.
Warm Water Performance with Firmware 1.0.0
In the first test, the Canon EOS R5 was placed in 88°F water using firmware version 1.0.0. This environment simulated some of the hottest tropical dive destinations. We closely monitored the water temperature and camera performance throughout the test. The camera managed to record continuously for 15 minutes and 40 seconds before shutting off due to overheating. After being left in the water to cool, it took 9 minutes and 10 seconds before the R5 could record another minute of footage. We also noted minor condensation forming on the inside of the housing, a common issue that can further complicate filming conditions.
While this performance may suffice for short clips or hybrid photo-video sessions, it falls short for projects requiring extended recording sessions. This test demonstrated the need for careful planning when using high-resolution video settings in warm water environments.
Firmware 1.1.1: A Noticeable Improvement in Warm Water
For the second test, we used the same water temperature of 88°F, but updated the camera to firmware version 1.1.1. This version included Canon’s official improvements in heat management. As expected, the results were better. The camera lasted 20 minutes and 42 seconds before overheating—an increase of over five minutes compared to firmware 1.0.0. The recovery time, however, was slightly longer. It took 14 minutes and 49 seconds before the camera was ready to capture one more minute of video.
This longer recovery period may be attributed to the higher heat accumulation from the extended recording session. Still, the improved duration confirms that firmware updates are essential for underwater videographers relying on the EOS R5 for intensive use. We strongly advise all users to install the latest firmware before diving with the camera.
Old Water Canon EOS R5 Overheating Test Setup
Following the warm water trials, we conducted our third test in significantly colder conditions to evaluate how the Canon EOS R5 performs in a typical coldwater dive setting. This test was critical for understanding the full thermal profile of the camera under underwater constraints. Coldwater diving is common in locations like the Pacific Northwest, Northern Atlantic, or deeper ocean environments, where thermal conditions differ drastically from tropical settings. In colder water, natural heat dissipation is more efficient, potentially enabling longer recording durations and shorter recovery intervals.
We used the same Ikelite polycarbonate housing as in previous tests and submerged the camera in water with a measured temperature of approximately 60°F (15.5°C). This is representative of colder diving environments encountered year-round in temperate regions. The camera had been updated to firmware version 1.1.1 to ensure the latest overheating management protocols were active.
As in the other tests, the Canon EOS R5 was set to record at 8K resolution, 30 frames per second, with internal RAW enabled. The goal was to maintain continuity across all testing environments and isolate the variable of water temperature. After the camera reached its thermal limit and shut off, we continued to monitor it while submerged, measuring the time it took until the R5 could record one additional minute of video. This allowed us to track both the duration of recording and the recovery time in a coldwater setting.
Cold Water Performance Results
The results from the cold water test were notably different from the warm water trials. The camera was able to record video for a continuous duration of 25 minutes and 48 seconds before reaching its overheating limit. This was a significant improvement over the warm water recordings, showing an increase of over five minutes when compared to the performance in 88°F water with the same firmware version. It also outperformed the original firmware test by more than ten minutes.
Once the overheating limit was reached, we left the housing submerged in the same cold water environment. The camera began its recovery process immediately after shutdown. After 11 minutes and 13 seconds, it was able to record for at least one more minute. While not the shortest recovery period observed, it was still quicker than the warm water trial conducted with the same firmware version. This supports the hypothesis that colder environments provide a more effective thermal buffer for cameras operating under heavy video loads.
It’s worth noting that there was no visible condensation within the housing during this test, which we attribute to the cooler ambient water temperature reducing the internal humidity buildup. This environmental factor alone could prove advantageous for coldwater divers capturing long-form video content.
Environmental Factors That Affect Heat Management
Water temperature plays an enormous role in camera heat dissipation underwater. While the Canon EOS R5 generates internal heat during high-resolution video capture, cold water acts as a natural coolant. The material of the underwater housing can also contribute to or inhibit this cooling effect. In our test, the polycarbonate housing provided moderate thermal insulation, meaning that a metal housing might have yielded even better cooling results due to improved thermal conductivity.
When heat is not effectively dissipated through the housing, the internal temperature of the camera builds quickly, triggering the automatic shutdown protection. In tropical water environments, this buildup is significantly faster, even though the outside of the housing may feel cool to the touch. Conversely, in cold water, external heat transfer is more efficient, allowing the camera to maintain operational temperatures for longer durations.
In practice, this means that underwater videographers in colder regions can realistically plan for longer recording sessions without the threat of overheating interfering with their workflow. Coldwater divers often wear thicker gloves and operate their cameras for more extended periods during a single descent due to the nature of the dive profile and equipment. The Canon EOS R5, while still limited by internal design, becomes a more viable tool for these divers when paired with proper firmware and an understanding of its limitations.
Underwater Recovery Patterns and Dive Planning
Another key consideration for underwater video shooters is the camera's recovery time following an overheating shutdown. While Canon provides estimated recovery intervals for land-based use, underwater performance is inherently different. Based on our coldwater results, it is clear that submersion in colder temperatures can reduce the amount of time needed for the camera to cool and become operational again. However, this recovery time still does not guarantee that a full-length video session can resume immediately. It merely allows a brief continuation of shooting, which may or may not align with the subject’s availability or the dive plan’s timing.
For example, if a videographer is documenting a marine species encounter and the camera overheats midway through the recording, the opportunity to capture the event in its entirety could be lost if recovery time exceeds the duration of the interaction. Additionally, recovery time underwater may be impacted by activity level, external pressure, current flow, and sunlight exposure at shallower depths.
Divers planning to use the R5 for multiple video clips per dive must anticipate these recovery gaps. Strategic filming—using short clips with pauses in between—may help extend the total usable recording time within a single dive. Furthermore, turning off the camera when not in use and minimizing menu interactions can conserve internal heat buildup, further delaying overheating triggers.
Why Cold Water Shooting Matters for R5 Users
The R5’s performance in cold water reaffirms its capability as a viable tool for underwater videographers, with caveats. By nearly reaching the 26-minute mark, the camera provides sufficient headroom for multiple shorter video segments or one continuous shot of moderate length. This makes it suitable for use in environments like kelp forests, rocky reefs, or shipwreck sites where scenes often evolve slowly and methodically.
In our experience, many coldwater dives last between 30 and 45 minutes, depending on conditions, depth, and diver experience. With thoughtful use, the R5 can capture an entire dive’s key moments when paired with coldwater conditions. However, extended shoot durations such as documentary-style footage or cinematic production may still exceed the R5’s thermal ceiling. In these cases, external recorders, temperature monitoring, or alternative camera systems may need to be considered.
We also emphasize the importance of acclimating your housing and gear before the dive. Rapid temperature shifts—such as placing the housing in cold water directly from a warm environment—can result in internal fogging. Using desiccant packets, pre-chilling your camera housing, or gently immersing it in cold water before powering on the camera can mitigate fogging and extend performance.
Practical Takeaways for Underwater Videographers
After reviewing the data from all tests, it becomes clear that underwater videographers must balance technical expectations with environmental realities. Firmware updates have indeed improved performance, but they do not eliminate the limitations entirely. Water temperature serves as a crucial determinant in whether the Canon EOS R5 can achieve its full potential during a dive.
For those planning shoots in colder climates or with access to deep dive sites, the EOS R5 may serve admirably for professional video capture—provided recording sessions are strategically managed. In contrast, warm water environments may require more conservative filming strategies or supplementary cooling techniques.
Recommendations for maximizing the R5’s performance in coldwater dives include:
-
Keep video clips short and spaced apart when possible
-
Power off the camera between shots to reduce internal heat buildup
-
Avoid prolonged menu navigation during the dive.
-
Use a metal housing when possible for improved thermal conductivity.
-
Pre-condition the housing and lens with anti-fog solutions
-
Carry multiple memory cards to avoid camera idling while transferring footage.
-
Dive with a thermal plan in mind: prioritize filming in the first half of the dive.
Each of these techniques can help mitigate the limitations presented by the R5’s internal heat generation during high-performance recording modes.
Comparative Analysis of Overheating Test Results
To better understand the Canon EOS R5’s behavior underwater, we compiled and compared results from the three key testing environments: warm water with firmware 1.0.0, warm water with firmware 1.1.1, and cold water with firmware 1.1.1. All three tests were conducted using the same camera model, Ikelite polycarbonate housing, and 8K @ 30p internal RAW video mode to ensure consistency. By analyzing the results side by side, distinct patterns emerged regarding heat generation, management, and recovery under varying conditions.
In the warm water test with firmware 1.0.0, the R5 recorded for 15 minutes and 40 seconds before overheating. Recovery time until it could film for one more minute was 9 minutes and 10 seconds. This served as our baseline.
Updating to firmware 1.1.1 in the same temperature conditions improved the maximum recording time to 20 minutes and 42 seconds — a five-minute increase — but the recovery time also increased to 14 minutes and 49 seconds. This suggests that although the new firmware allows longer initial recording sessions, it may also result in higher internal heat buildup, thus extending the cooldown interval.
The coldwater test using firmware 1.1.1 produced the best performance: 25 minutes and 48 seconds of recording time and a recovery interval of 11 minutes and 13 seconds. Although this test shared the same firmware as the second test, the colder water facilitated significantly better thermal regulation.
These differences confirm that both firmware and environmental temperature play critical roles in the R5’s ability to manage internal heat. Firmware 1.1.1 shows clear improvements, but performance gains are further magnified when combined with naturally cooling environments like coldwater dives.
Impact of Housing Material on Heat Dissipation
Although all three tests were conducted with a polycarbonate housing, the material properties of camera housings are crucial in determining how well heat is transferred from the camera to the surrounding water. Polycarbonate is a strong, impact-resistant plastic commonly used in underwater housings due to its durability and transparency. However, it is not thermally conductive. This means it tends to trap heat within the housing and the camera itself, potentially accelerating overheating when video settings are demanding.
In contrast, aluminum housings, which are offered by some housing manufacturers, provide significantly better thermal conductivity. Aluminum absorbs heat from the camera body more efficiently and transfers it to the surrounding water faster than polycarbonate. This difference can impact how quickly a camera reaches its thermal limit and how quickly it recovers afterward.
Though our testing did not include an aluminum housing trial, prior anecdotal reports from divers have noted extended video durations and shorter recovery periods when aluminum housings were used. This can be particularly beneficial for videographers shooting in warmer water environments where thermal buildup is a major concern.
Therefore, users of the Canon EOS R5 who expect to shoot high-resolution video regularly, especially in warm water, may consider investing in an aluminum housing to optimize performance. The increased cost and weight are notable, but for certain filming scenarios, the trade-off is worth the operational reliability gained.
Establishing Realistic Filming Workflows with the EOS R5
Understanding the practical limitations of the EOS R5 underwater allows divers and videographers to design realistic, efficient filming workflows. No camera system is perfect, and the R5 is no exception. However, with thoughtful planning and awareness of its constraints, users can maximize its capabilities to capture high-quality underwater footage.
Planning Dive Profiles Around Camera Heat Cycles
The first step in developing a successful workflow is dive planning with camera heat cycles in mind. Rather than attempting to record continuously for long durations, divers should strategize their footage into segments. The R5's overheating behavior is most problematic during uninterrupted high-resolution shooting. By spacing out shots, the user allows the camera to shed accumulated heat between clips.
One approach is to allocate specific portions of the dive to video and others to photography. For example, in the first 10 minutes of a dive, a videographer may capture several short clips (1 to 3 minutes each), followed by 5 to 10 minutes of photography or camera-off time. This stop-start rhythm helps extend total video time throughout the dive without pushing the camera to its thermal limits too early.
Monitoring Housing and Environmental Conditions
Environmental awareness is also essential. Divers should monitor water temperature as part of their filming protocol. Warmer waters (above 84°F) are more likely to exacerbate overheating issues, particularly in shallow areas with direct sunlight. Cooler water, deeper depths, or shaded reef walls offer better thermal conditions for extended shooting.
The housing itself should be checked for condensation, which is often a precursor to overheating. Divers can include desiccant packs inside the housing to help reduce moisture, especially during warm water dives. Visual fogging on the port or internal glass elements may be an early warning sign that heat is affecting internal housing humidity.
Efficient Use of Camera Settings
Beyond environmental planning, camera settings play a vital role in managing heat output. Shooting in 8K with internal RAW is the most thermally demanding setting on the EOS R5. Unless necessary for the project’s resolution or post-production requirements, users should consider downshifting to less demanding modes.
For example, recording in 4K at 60p or 4K HQ mode can offer excellent video quality with lower processing demands. Lower resolutions and framerates generate less heat and allow longer clips without thermal interruptions. Additionally, using external recording systems that bypass internal codecs — although requiring extra gear — can mitigate overheating by offloading processing from the internal system.
Autofocus, in-body image stabilization (IBIS), and other real-time processing tools also contribute to internal heat. Disabling features not essential to a specific shot may result in measurable performance gains.
Memory Management and File Handling
Another often overlooked factor is file management during a dive. Recording at 8K RAW fills memory cards extremely fast — around 300 GB for just 20 minutes of footage. Swapping cards mid-dive is not an option, so planning sufficient storage is vital.
Memory card speed also impacts how quickly the camera processes and clears video buffers. Using CFexpress cards with the highest sustained write speeds helps the camera offload data more efficiently, slightly easing thermal strain during intensive operations.
Divers should consider pre-formatting their cards before the dive and ensuring they’re empty. This eliminates in-dive writing delays and maximizes available recording time.
Real-World Filming Strategy for a Single Dive
A realistic and effective shooting workflow for a 45-minute dive in 82°F tropical water might look like this:
-
Descent (0–5 mins): Camera off; navigate to subject site
-
Mid-depth (6–15 mins): 2–3 clips of 1–3 minutes in 8K RAW
-
Middle phase (16–25 mins): Switch to 4K HQ; shoot brief supplemental footage
-
Upper reef (26–35 mins): Camera off, take stills or scout future compositions
-
Safety stop (36–45 mins): Power on camera for a final 1–2 minute clip
Such pacing reduces the risk of overheating while still delivering valuable, varied content across the dive’s timeline.
Comparing the EOS R5 with Other Cameras in Its Class
While the EOS R5 offers exceptional resolution and dynamic range, its overheating limitations are more pronounced than some competitors when pushed to the extreme. Other mirrorless and DSLR systems offer 4K recording capabilities without internal RAW, which substantially reduces heat output and increases reliability.
However, the EOS R5 excels in hybrid use scenarios. For shooters who want top-tier still images along with bursts of cinematic video, it offers unique advantages — particularly in natural light or ambient scenes where detail and clarity are paramount. The R5’s autofocus, color science, and lens compatibility also make it appealing to photographers who transition between topside and underwater shooting environments.
When comparing systems for professional underwater video work, shooters must weigh resolution needs against reliability. Cameras like the Panasonic GH6 or Sony A7S III may offer lower resolution but outperform the R5 in thermal consistency during long sessions. On the other hand, when used strategically, the R5 delivers visuals that few others in its class can match.
Addressing Common User Questions
Based on field experience and diver feedback, several recurring questions emerge regarding the Canon EOS R5 and its thermal performance:
Can the EOS R5 be used reliably for underwater video?
Yes, but with thoughtful planning. Avoid continuous 8K recording. Use burst shooting strategies. Monitor temperature and condensation, and power the camera off when idle.
Will switching to external power reduce overheating?
External battery solutions may reduce strain on internal batteries, but they do not significantly impact internal heat buildup from the sensor and processor. Internal recording remains the main cause of heat, not battery drain.
Does shooting in C-Log affect overheating?
Using Canon Log profiles themselves does not affect heat, but certain picture profile settings may cause additional processing. Stick to neutral profiles unless Log is required for color grading.
Should I avoid 8K entirely?
Not necessarily. Use 8K strategically for short clips or wide master shots. For regular shooting, opt for 4K HQ or 4K 60p for a balance of quality and stability.
Will cooling breaks during a dive help?
Yes. Turning the camera off between shots, even briefly, helps reduce internal temperature buildup. Passive cooling is effective underwater due to water’s natural thermal conductivity.
Post-Production Considerations for 8K Underwater Video
Capturing footage in 8K resolution at 30p with internal RAW on the Canon EOS R5 creates a new set of challenges beyond just underwater overheating. While these files offer remarkable detail and dynamic range, they also demand a high-performance editing workflow, powerful computer hardware, and ample storage infrastructure. A single dive producing 20 to 25 minutes of 8K RAW video can easily occupy 300 to 400 gigabytes of disk space. Videographers must plan accordingly to manage this data load.
In post-production, 8K RAW footage provides flexibility for color correction, noise reduction, and cropping without noticeable loss in quality. This can be especially useful when correcting underwater color casts or stabilizing shaky footage. However, the sheer size of the files often necessitates the use of proxy editing workflows, where a lower-resolution version of the footage is created and edited, with final rendering using the full-resolution originals.
Compression settings during export should also be optimized for the final use case. Delivering to 4K or 1080p platforms still allows 8K source material to shine, often resulting in crisper, cleaner visuals. For marine conservation work, science documentation, or commercial broadcast, these high-resolution masters serve as valuable assets, but they should be balanced against the limitations of underwater shooting time and overheating constraints.
Editors must also consider the color profile. Footage captured in Canon Log (C-Log) or C-Log3 allows for maximum grading flexibility. Correcting for the natural loss of red and orange wavelengths underwater is much easier with high-bit-depth footage. However, working with C-Log footage requires some understanding of LUTs (lookup tables) and color grading principles to restore natural underwater hues.
Long-Term Care for the Canon EOS R5 Underwater
To maintain the R5's performance and longevity in underwater environments, routine maintenance and thoughtful handling are essential. Underwater housings protect the camera body from water exposure but do not eliminate wear from heat cycling, humidity, and pressure. After each dive, users should inspect their housing for leaks, clean all o-rings, and dry internal electronics thoroughly.
Heat cycling, particularly during overheating events, may stress internal camera components. While the R5 is designed with thermal protection to prevent damage, repeated overheating can reduce the lifespan of sensitive electronics. It is good practice to avoid allowing the camera to reach shutoff temperatures frequently. Instead, learn to use the camera’s temperature warning indicators and shut down voluntarily when needed.
Battery health should also be monitored. Extended use of video recording at high resolutions drains the battery quickly and generates heat. Over time, this can lead to degraded battery performance. Carrying fresh, high-quality batteries and rotating them properly extends the system's operational reliability.
Sensor cleaning is another important maintenance step. Saltwater environments carry microscopic particles that may enter the housing during lens changes. These can adhere to the sensor or internal optics. Using a proper cleaning kit and inspecting for particles after each trip ensures image clarity and sensor health.
Finally, the firmware of both the camera and the housing (if electronically controlled) should be kept updated. Manufacturers often release improvements for heat management, lens compatibility, autofocus performance, and file handling, which can have a significant impact on both topside and underwater shooting efficiency.
Best Practices for Underwater Video with the EOS R5
Through our testing and real-world experience, several best practices have emerged for maximizing the use of the Canon EOS R5 underwater without falling victim to overheating or workflow bottlenecks.
Use high-speed memory cards. The EOS R5 benefits from CFexpress cards with high sustained write speeds. This allows the camera to offload internal buffers quickly and avoid additional internal processing time.
Pre-plan shot sequences. Avoid random filming that leads to long periods of continuous recording. Instead, storyboard your dive. Know which subjects you plan to capture and how long you need for each.
Pack desiccant and anti-fog inserts. Minor condensation during a dive can ruin a shot or signal rising internal temperature. Desiccant packets help maintain a dry environment inside the housing.
Leverage cold water if available. Coldwater environments offer natural advantages when filming long sequences. If shooting in tropical waters, dive deeper or in shaded areas to access cooler conditions.
Practice efficient battery management. Start each dive with a fully charged battery, and turn off the camera between filming sessions. This reduces the accumulation of unnecessary heat from idle background processes.
Alternate between stills and video. The R5 is a powerful still camera. Mixing media types during a dive helps reduce thermal load and provides a broader range of visual content.
Avoid playback during the dive. Reviewing 8K footage during the dive consumes processing power and generates heat. Playback is best reserved for surface intervals or after the dive.
Prepare multiple dive plans. In case overheating occurs earlier than expected, have a backup plan to focus on still photography or scouting. This prevents frustration and maximizes the value of each dive.
Real-World Expectations vs. Technical Specifications
One of the most important lessons from these tests is the distinction between what the EOS R5 can theoretically achieve versus what is realistically possible in underwater environments. While Canon advertises the R5 as capable of 20 minutes of 8K RAW video at 23°C, real-world conditions like tropical waters, housing material, dive duration, and user behavior greatly affect performance.
Specifications on paper often assume optimal airflow and dry environments. Underwater, thermal exchange is passive and limited by housing design. This means divers must manage expectations and adjust behavior accordingly. The Canon EOS R5 is capable of creating cinematic underwater content, but it is not designed for uninterrupted long-form 8K documentation in extreme conditions.
Understanding these constraints and working within them is the key to enjoying the benefits of the R5 without encountering its drawbacks. With strategic planning and careful execution, the camera becomes a reliable and powerful tool for underwater videography.
Conclusion
The Canon EOS R5 has redefined what is possible for hybrid shooters seeking exceptional image quality in both still photography and video. Underwater, the R5 reveals both its strengths and its limitations. While the R5 may not be the ultimate solution for all underwater videographers, it remains a formidable choice for those who understand its intricacies and plan accordingly. It is especially well-suited to hybrid users who wish to switch between stunning stills and cinematic video within the same dive. Ultimately, the Canon EOS R5 rewards patience, planning, and precision. For underwater storytellers willing to adapt, it opens creative possibilities once only available to much larger and more expensive systems. When used wisely, it becomes a powerful ally in capturing the beauty and mystery of the underwater world.